hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
Fri Jul 13 20:12:58 EDT 2012
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:32:01AM +0100, Sam Sanders wrote:
> Dear members of the FOM list,
> I would like your opinion on the following statements (Please declare them true/false, with a possible explanation why).
> ) infinitesimals are used throughout physics and engineering (in some
> informal way, formalizable in Nonstandard Analysis).
Yes, they're used informally throughout. This drove us physics
studennts mad with indefiniteness until we learned the proper
epsilon-delta definition of derivatives.
But I learned you can formalize differentials themselves, and
derivatives become their ratios. You don't need nonstandard analysis.
f be a function and we're interested in its differential df at x.
At x, df is a linear function such that for all e > 0 there exists a
delta > 0 such that for h less than delta,
|df(h) - f(x) + f(x + h)| < eh
These df functions act like differentials.
The definition also works for functions for Rn to Rm. The differential
becomes a linear function from vectors to vectors and the various
absolute values of difference become the metric on these spaces.
> 2) when infinitesimals are used in physics and engineering, the choice of infinitesimal does not matter
> (i.e. a calculation involving an infinitesimal \e remains valid if \e is replaced with any other infinitesimal \e' .)
in the above formulation, switching between e and e' is not much more
than taking different values of h. It's not even interesting any more.
> 3) The aforementioned independence (of the choice of infinitesimal) in physics and engineering has been observed before by X (Please fill in X).
No idea who noticed it first. I've had very little use for the
nonstandard version of differentials. I've noticed it, but it seems
more to ba a matter of how you define the algebra of nonstandard
More information about the FOM