[FOM] Some questions regarding irrational numbers
Daniel Méhkeri
dmehkeri at yahoo.ca
Mon Mar 2 12:58:24 EST 2009
> By the way, perhaps a suitable definition of
> "artificial example" here would be something like this.
> For an example to avoid the charge of artificiality, the
> standard way of stating the conjecture has to have the
> form "x is an integer" or "x = 17" or something like that.
Ideally, but is it really necessary? For instance if instead I had been able to say (totally making this up): "tanh^-1(gamma(sinh(42))) = 42 if and only if the Goldbach conjecture is true" - then although the Goldbach conjecture isn't usually stated that way at all, it really looks like a simple and natural computable number doesn't it?
Regards,
Daniel
__________________________________________________________________
Obtenez l'adresse de courriel parfaite: @ymail.com or @rocketmail.com. Obtenez votre nouvelle adresse maintenant à http://cf.new..mail.yahoo.com/addresses.
More information about the FOM
mailing list