[FOM] Defining embedding dimensions
joeshipman@aol.com
joeshipman at aol.com
Sat Jul 25 18:56:54 EDT 2009
Nash proved that any Riemannian manifold of dimension n can be
isometrically embedded in Euclidean space of dimension at most m=f(n),
where the function f was improved by later researchers.
My questions are,
1) Can the "best possible" function f be defined in Peano Arithmetic?
Currently established upper and lower bounds for f represent
ZFC-theorems, and one can imagine a situation where there exist n and m
such that ZFC does not settle the question whether dimension m suffices
to isometrically embed all n-dimensional Riemannian manifolds; even in
that case ZFC still defines the function f(n) but PA may not. (On the
other hand, if ZFC settles all such questions about individual values
of f(n) then one can define f in PA in terms of ZFC-proofs.)
2) Is there an analogous theorem to Nash's embedding theorem for
Einstein/Kahler type metrics, and what are the best known bounds on the
dimension in that case?
-- JS
More information about the FOM
mailing list