[FOM] methodological thesis
rgheck at brown.edu
Thu May 1 16:28:10 EDT 2008
Marcin Mostowski wrote:
> Richard Heck seemingly gives a few counterexamples. Some of them are hard to
> evaluate for me because I do not remember all the details of quoted books. I
> will comment only two of them.
> Counterexample 2: Peter Strawson, /Individuals/
> As I remember it was an attempt to make an informally formulated ontology
> based on ramified type theory. Goedel a few years later presented his
> constructible sets theory in a way much better than Strawson and much more
> conclusive. This example supports rather the Friedman thesis.
Uh, no, you're not remembering. That's not remotely what Strawson was up
to, and constructible sets have nothing to do with it.
> Counterexample 7: David Hume, /A Treatise of Human Nature/
> This is a good example of pretheoretical work in psychology covered later by
> psychological investigations, which seems still to be at starting level of
> any good scientific theory.
To be sure, Hume's ideas about psychology are inspirational. (See
Fodor's recent book _Hume Variations_.) But Harvey spoke of FORMAL
ideas. And aren't you rather forgetting about Book III?
Richard G Heck Jr
Professor of Philosophy
More information about the FOM