[FOM] Category and Measure
joeshipman@aol.com
joeshipman at aol.com
Mon Sep 17 03:32:50 EDT 2007
Two notions of a "small set of reals" are common in descriptive set
theory:
A set is null (or "measure 0") if it can be covered by a sequence of
intervals of arbitrarily small total length
A set is meager (or "1st category") if it is a union of countably many
nowhere-dense sets
Unfortunately for intuition, both of these cannot be thought of as
"small" because the reals can be expressed as a union of a null set and
a meager set!
I understand why it make sense to think of null sets as "small", and
know of many applications of this notion. I also understand that the
notion of meager set makes sense in arbitrary topological spaces, while
the notion of null set requires a measure space.
But, can someone explain what's so useful about meager sets when
working with a measure space like the real numbers?
In other words, what kinds of results of (ordinary real) analysis can
be proven with arguments about category but not with arguments about
measure? (The more elementary the statement of the *result*, the better
-- the *proofs* don't have to be elementary.)
-- JS
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
More information about the FOM
mailing list