[FOM] FLT and ZFC, again
friedman at math.ohio-state.edu
Thu Dec 6 12:45:00 EST 2007
On 12/6/07 11:23 AM, "Timothy Y. Chow" <tchow at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I recently had an email exchange with a number theorist (who prefers to
> remain anonymous, but who gave permission for his anonymized remarks to
> be forwarded to FOM) regarding the possibility that the current proof of
> Fermat's Last Theorem might require axioms beyond ZFC. His response:
>> Oh, come on! :-) Just because a proof uses a cohomology theory doesn't
>> mean that it depends on Grothendieck universes. ...
All of this was well known to me, having talked to number theorists.
But the real issues remain: can be avoid 3rd order arithmetic? 2nd order
arithmetic? Is it provable in first order arithmetic? It is provable in
primitive recursive arithmetic? Is it provable in EFA = exponential function
arithmetic = ISigma0(exp)?
I have not worked on these problems, but have spent a fair amount of time
trying to get others to work on them.
Also, Colin McLarty had "agreed" to document the removal of Grothendieck
universes from FLT. Colin?
More information about the FOM