[FOM] Replacement

[Jan Pax]

E.g. with replacement, every well ordered set is isomorphic to a (unique) ordinal.
JP

>  I know there are lots of people who dislike the axiom scheme of 
>  replacement.  They say things like ``it has no consequence for
>  ordinary mathematics'' and the like.  Unfortunately i have none 
>  of them handy at the moment, so i have to ask:  do any of them 
>  think that the axiom scheme is actually *false*?  Or do they 
>  merely think that it shouldn't be a core axiom?
>  
>       tf
>  
>  
>  -- 
>  Home page: www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~tf; dpmms phone +44-1223-337981. 
>  In NZ until october work ph +64-3367001 and ask for extension 8152.
>  Mobile in NZ +64-21-0580093 (Mobile in UK +44-7887-701-562).
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  FOM mailing list
>  FOM at cs.nyu.edu
>  http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom
>  
>  
>