[FOM] Concerning Ultrafinitism.

[Robbie Lindauer]

Mr. Ozkural, the dichotomy between:

1)  There are an infinite number of integers
and
2) there is a largest integer

is a false dichotomy since there are at least these three other options:

a)  There may be no number of integers at all.
	There is no reason to suspect that there is a number of Cardinal 
Numbers, why should we expect that there is a number of integers?
b)  The integers AS A WHOLE may not themselves exist, just as the 
Cardinal Numbers AS A WHOLE may not exist.
	The integers as defined by successors in counting of "1" where 
counting is the practice of identifying the succeeding integer by 
adding 1 to the given integer may or may not identify any REAL THINGS.  
That is, it is a practice of generating words which themselves may not 
have referents.  There is no reason, in general, to assume that just 
because there is a word for something that the thing it is supposed to 
refer to exists.  So the fact that we have a word-structure "All the 
Cardinal Numbers" does not lead us to deduce that there is any such 
thing, neither should it in the case of "All the Integers".
c)  The integers may be fundamentally incomplete.
	Any given set of integers can be show to NOT be the complete set of 
integers.  The "complete set of integers" then may not in fact exist - 
that is, may not in fact be giveable in a complete intuition.  For if 
it were so given, it would be possible to produce an integer not in the 
given set, thus contradicting the theory that it is the whole set of 
integers.


Finally a not-very-related mathematical question:


is this a proved theorem (false or true):

Given a unique and infinite decimal expansion of two real numbers X and 
Y, there is a non-finite intersection of those expansions of X and Y, 
e.g. given a series of integers in the decimal expansion of x:

...21837283940....274829304... there is a non-finite series of integers 
in Y identical to it.



Robbie Lindauer