[FOM] Quantification and Identity

[Dean Buckner]

Peter Apostoli wrote

>This is the consistent universe of "naive" sets predicted
> using formal methods by Nino Cocchiarella.

Where?

A further point.  The notion of identity as "coextensiveness" only makes
sense for sets, is that correct?  An account for objects other than sets (if
there are any) would have to be radically different, surely.



Dean Buckner
London
ENGLAND

Work 020 7676 1750
Home 020 8788 4273