FOM: cardinals in ZFC fragments
friedman at mbi.math.ohio-state.edu
Tue Aug 6 15:59:01 EDT 2002
I have the feeling that there are various results, positive and negative,
scattered throughout the literature and folklore on the following problem.
I would appreciate hearing about such results.
Let T be a set theory. We say that T "handles cardinals as objects" if and
only if there is a formula phi(x,y) of set theory, with at most x free,
such that T proves the following.
1. (forall x)(therexistsunique y)(phi(x,y)).
2. phi(x,y) and phi(z,w) implies "x,z are equinumerous iff y = w".
It is standard that ZFC handles cardinals as objects, by taking y = the von
Neumann cardinal of x.
Scott showed that ZF handles cardinals as objects.
But what about other fragments of ZFC?
More information about the FOM