FOM: large cardinals and P vs NP
sacook at cs.toronto.edu
Thu Aug 2 11:33:17 EDT 2001
Further to the question of whether large cardinals might help
settle the P vs NP question, could someone answer the following
I suppose that a large cardinal axiom could be consistent with ZFC,
but in some sense still false. But in this case, could it imply
a false statement of number theory?
More precisely, suppose C is a large cardinal axiom and A is a statement
of first-order number theory. Suppose that C + ZFC is consistent,
and C+ ZFC implies A. Is A necessarily true?
More information about the FOM