FOM: Re: Tennant's reply to Detlefsen, McLarty, Tait
cxm7 at po.cwru.edu
Wed Sep 9 16:19:55 EDT 1998
reply to Neil Tennant <neilt at mercutio.cohums.ohio-state.edu>
>This is a reply to Mic Detlefsen's welcome contribution to the
>discussion on Brouwer (Tue Sep 8 13:11 EDT 1998), and includes also
>some further response to Colin McLarty's most recent postings.
I also want to thank Mic. I first began thinking seriously about
Brouwer after reading Mic's articles on him.
Niel wrote in reply to me:
>We are now getting to the heart of the matter. Colin is in effect
>advancing the view that "knowledge (or:intuition) THAT p" somehow
>boils down or reduces to "intuitions OF various x's".
I did not advance the view. I said it was common, and that Brouwer
held a variant of it.
>But it is a famous point, first made by Frege and then hammered home
>by Geach (in his classic little study "Mental Acts") that singular
>relational propositions cannot be reduced to (a mere aggregate of)
>their referential constituents.
The question is whether Brouwer was aware of this point and adapted
his thinking about intuitionism to it. I think not.
More information about the FOM