FOM: Question: why is category theory viewed as relativism?
mthayer at ix.netcom.com
Tue Mar 10 22:35:40 EST 1998
There seems to be an understanding on fom that Category Theory offers only a
What is the reason for this view? The only argument I have seen seems to be
that there is no specific topos offered as a foundation for analysis. How
does this differ from the discredited view that set theory does not offer a
foundation for analysis, because there is no distinguished notion of natural
number. (The tired old "is e a member of pi" objection). I understand why
relativist foundations is an oxymoron, and I don't wish to defend
post-modernism or whatever on this list. Just an answer to a simple
Telephony/Speech Software Inc.
More information about the FOM