FOM: Simplicity, Calculus, Need for new axioms
David Ross
ross at math.hawaii.edu
Fri Nov 14 12:23:18 EST 1997
I should emphasize that this result *does* have a simple nonstandard proof
(sans epsilonics), but that the nonstandard machinery used is marginally
deeper than for easier results (e.g., a continuous function of a continuous
function is continuous) and so is an interesting first test of the utility of
'more concrete' infinitesimals.
- David (ross at sierpinski.math.hawaii.edu)
(J Shipman wrote:
>
> 2) Thanks to David Ross for his example. OK, nonstandard analysts: is the
> theorem "continuous function attains a max on closed interval" true in any
> concrete models of infinitesimals such as the surreals or the surreals up to
> ordinal stage alpha for some infinite alpha? If so, great! If not, how hard
> is it to prove that it still holds for the subfield of standard reals without
> simply duplicating the epsilonics of standard analysis?
)
More information about the FOM
mailing list