rhersh at math.unm.edu
Sun Dec 14 11:59:22 EST 1997
You can find comment and critique on Lakatos, with a good deal of
overlap, in these places:
Mathematical Intelligencer, the first or 2d issue.
THe Mathematial Experience, P J Davis & R Hersh, Birkhauser, now available
in a seond edition.
What is Mathematics Really, R. Hersh, Oxford U. Press.
Also there is a
whole book about Lakatos, I forget the author & title, recently reviewed
in Philosophia Mathematica.
Paul Ernest reviewed Lakatos in Math Reviews, shortly after it was
He also treats Lakatos in two books, Philosophy of Mathematics Education
and Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics.
Cambridge or is it Oxford published a 2-volume collexted works of Lakatos.
The Boston Seminar (Symposium?) on philosophy of science published
a memorial volume for him.
On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Jeffery Zucker wrote:
> I recently read "Proofs and Refutations" by Imre Lakatos.
> Many subscribers to this list will be familiar with this
> classic work, but I'll summarise it briefly.
> It grew out of Lakatos' 1961 Cambridge PhD thesis under
> R. Braithwaite, and was strongly influenced by Karl Popper.
> It was edited and published posthumously by John Worrall
> and Elie Zahar in 1976.
> I'll quote briefly from the author's Introduction:
> "Its modest aim is to elaborate the point that informal,
> quasi-empirical, mathematics does not grow through
> a monotonous increase of the number of indubitably
> established theorems but through the incessant
> improvement of guesses by speculation and criticism,
> by the logic of proofs and refutations"
> The bulk of the book is in the form of a case study
> (in dialogue form), in which Euler's celebrated theorem for
> polyhedra (V-E+F=2) is subjected to a series of successive
> proofs and refutations, the latter being dealt with (not only
> by revisions of the proofs, but also) by successive
> re-formulations of the theorem, involving re-definitions of
> the notion of "polygon".
> I was impressed, not only by the author's philosophical
> brilliance (as it seems to me), but also by the
> dazzling erudition displayed in his historical footnotes.
> I have two questions, with which members of this list
> may be able to help me:
> (1) In spite of Lakatos's strong (to me) arguments,
> his work seems to have had little, if any, discernible effect
> on mathematical pedagogy, including the style of textbooks.
> Why is this?
> (2) What has been written in response to this work
> (for or against)?
> BTW, Moshe Machover (whom the editors acknowledge for
> his help) may have some interesting insights on this.
> Jeff Zucker
> Computer Science Dept, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. L8S 4K1, Canada
> zucker at mcmaster.ca || http://www.dcss.mcmaster.ca/~zucker/z.html
> (905) 525-9140 x 23438 || fax (905) 546-9995
More information about the FOM